Clermont
Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Adopted
General Fund total · p. 53
Department lines add to $641,822 less than the stated total
Clermont budget document ↗Independent summary of public records. Not affiliated with any candidate or campaign. Not the official City of Minneola website. Spot an error? Submit a correction.
Budget / Compare spending
Start with a service. Follow the City and CRA contributions, explore nearby budgets, then check what broader benchmarks can tell us.
FY2026: October 2025–September 2026 · Evidence reviewed October 5, 2026 · Source version & limitations
Per-resident figures round to the nearest whole dollar. Dollar totals retain their current precision.
Minneola · available FY2026 plan
$36,516,934
As printed, including the $9M grant and CRA payments
Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Adopted
General Fund total · p. 53
Department lines add to $641,822 less than the stated total
Clermont budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted (fund totals only)
General Fund total (Resolution 25-62, Exhibit A) · p. 87
Eustis budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed (adopted version not found)
General Fund total · p. 75
Proposed budget; includes solid waste
Fruitland Park budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
General Fund total · p. 91
Includes $4.87M of reserves and $3.2M of transfers out
Groveland budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
General Fund total · p. 14
Includes $4.9M of capital
Lady Lake budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
General Fund total · p. 94
Department amounts are net of charges to city-owned utilities
Leesburg budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed tables in final-hearing packet
General Fund total · p. 16
Includes a one-time $20M public works facility
Mascotte budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
General Fund total · p. 26
Includes $1.91M of CRA tax increment; the city also runs an electric utility
Mount Dora budget document ↗No matching actual-spending benchmark has been selected for this category. Parks history and capital evidence remain available separately.
No selected benchmark in this source group for this category. Try another source group; absence here is not a confirmed zero.
No applicable dollar spending recommendation has been verified for this category. An observed average is not a recommended minimum. Service access, response and facilities targets need their own local evidence.
Professional recommendation · reserves
GFOA recommends unrestricted budgetary General Fund balance of at least two months of regular General Fund operating revenues or expenditures, with a locally appropriate risk assessment. This is reserve guidance, not a target for total spending. A matching local balance and denominator have not been established here.
GFOA fund balance guidelines ↗Minneola · available FY2026 plan
$2,918,157
Sheriff’s office contract
Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Adopted
Police · p. 95
Clermont budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted (fund totals only)
Not obtained
Not comparable: Budget book recovered; department figures not yet selected for this comparison
Eustis budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed (adopted version not found)
Law Enforcement · p. 45
Fruitland Park budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed tables in final-hearing packet
Police · p. 16
Mascotte budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Police Services, excluding code enforcement · pp. 82, 184
Tavares budget document ↗Observed benchmark · not a target
$451
Municipal expenditures, FY2024 (our median of 65 cities)
Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research (state financial reports)
FY2024 actual spending, all funds, account 521 Law Enforcement
Middle half of reported values: $318–$602.
This is our median of all 65 Florida cities with an FY2024 state workbook in the 10,000–24,999 population band, not a statewide average or a service-matched peer group. Non-provider, zero and missing-report screening remains outstanding; no arithmetic gap is shown.
EDR per-city expenditure workbooks, sheet 2024 (every city workbook with FY2024 population 10,000–24,999: 65 cities, Minneola included); medians and nearest-rank quartiles computed by us, checked October 20, 2026 ↗Observed benchmark · not a target
2.71 officers per 1,000
Police department ratios workbook, 2025 (our median of 57 departments)
Florida Department of Law Enforcement
Lake County departments range from 1.46 (Tavares) to 2.38 (Mount Dora)
Middle half of reported values: 2.13 officers per 1,000–3.19 officers per 1,000.
Minneola isn’t in this data because it contracts with the Sheriff’s Office. Police leaders’ associations say officers-per-resident ratios are not a basis for staffing decisions.
FDLE statewide ratios page; PD-Ratios-2025.xlsx ↗No selected benchmark in this source group for this category. Try another source group; absence here is not a confirmed zero.
No applicable dollar spending recommendation has been verified for this category. An observed average is not a recommended minimum. Service access, response and facilities targets need their own local evidence.
Minneola · available FY2026 plan
$6,675,299
Includes $1.18M capital
Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Adopted
Fire + EMS transport + fire inspection · pp. 103–111
Includes a new $3.33M EMS transport program
Clermont budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted (fund totals only)
Not obtained
Not comparable: Budget book recovered; department figures not yet selected for this comparison
Eustis budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed (adopted version not found)
Villages fire contract · p. 47
Not comparable: Pass-through for fire service from The Villages Public Safety Department
Fruitland Park budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Fire Operations Fund (separate fund) · p. 117
Partly paid by a $3.15M General Fund transfer
Groveland budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Villages fire assessment pass-through · p. 89
Not comparable: Fire service comes from The Villages Public Safety Department through a pass-through assessment
Lady Lake budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Fire · p. 107
Includes building inspection (Life Safety)
Leesburg budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed tables in final-hearing packet
Fire Department · p. 31
Not comparable: Lake County Fire Rescue provides fire service
Mascotte budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Fire Services (General Fund share) · p. 26
Not comparable: Only the General Fund share; a separate fire-assessment fund also pays for fire service
Mount Dora budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Fire · p. 82
Fire assessment revenue is transferred into the General Fund
Tavares budget document ↗Observed benchmark · not a target
$236
Municipal expenditures, FY2024 (our median of 65 cities)
Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research (state financial reports)
FY2024 actual spending, all funds, account 522 Fire Control
Middle half of reported values: $8–$361.
This is our median of all 65 Florida cities with an FY2024 state workbook in the 10,000–24,999 population band, not a statewide average or a service-matched peer group. Non-provider, zero and missing-report screening remains outstanding; no arithmetic gap is shown.
EDR per-city expenditure workbooks, sheet 2024 (every city workbook with FY2024 population 10,000–24,999: 65 cities, Minneola included); medians and nearest-rank quartiles computed by us, checked October 20, 2026 ↗No selected benchmark in this source group for this category. Try another source group; absence here is not a confirmed zero.
No applicable dollar spending recommendation has been verified for this category. An observed average is not a recommended minimum. Service access, response and facilities targets need their own local evidence.
Professional guidance · applicability not established
NFPA 1710 (2020 edition) · First engine on scene within 4 minutes of driving time, 90% of the time
The cited edition is retained as research context. Its current status, local applicability and Minneola’s matching service measure must be checked before assessing performance; this is not a verified local requirement or compliance finding.
Read the cited guidance: NFPA 1710 standard page (summary verified from secondary sources) ↗Minneola · available FY2026 plan
$732,242
General Fund parks and recreation staff + operating lines. No additional CRA operations line selected; complete fund mapping is not established.
City + CRA · identified service uses
This combined context includes all selected operations, capital and unsplit grant lines. It can differ from the narrower comparison category above.
FY2026 posted plan · final version unconfirmed. These are known subtotals, not a complete citywide service inventory.
| Spending fund | Identified amount |
|---|---|
| General Fund | $816,668 |
| Downtown CRA | $4,750,000 |
| Mountain Properties CRA | No service line selected · not a confirmed zero |
| Other City funds | Full service mapping not established |
Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Adopted
Parks and Recreation, staff and operating · p. 153
Includes arts and performing arts centers; grounds maintenance is in Public Works
Clermont budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted (fund totals only)
Not obtained
Not comparable: Budget book recovered; department figures not yet selected for this comparison
Eustis budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed (adopted version not found)
Parks maintenance + Recreation, staff and operating · pp. 70–75
Excludes the pool
Fruitland Park budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Parks/Community Services, staff and operating · pp. 90, 94
Excludes a $16,000 county library contribution
Groveland budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Parks and Recreation, staff and operating · pp. 14, 71–72
Lady Lake budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Recreation, staff and operating · pp. 108–109
Includes the marina and Bikefest
Leesburg budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed tables in final-hearing packet
Parks and Recreation · p. 38
Plus $100K for special events
Mascotte budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Recreation + Parks & Community Building, staff and operating · p. 26; sales-tax fund park maintenance · p. 99
Includes special events
Mount Dora budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Park & Recreation staff and operating · p. 82; splash park and Wooton Park maintenance in the marina fund · p. 478
Tavares budget document ↗Observed benchmark · not a target
$133
2026 Agency Performance Review, Figure 15 (printed p. 22)
National Recreation and Park Association
Minneola moved into this band in 2025
Middle half of reported values: $72–$251.
NRPA says these results are not standards that agencies should strive to meet. Survey medians describe reporting agencies. A recommended spending level or Minneola funding shortfall has not been established.
NRPA 2026 APR, printed p. 22 and p. 3 ↗Observed benchmark · not a target
$155
2026 Agency Performance Review, Figure 15 (printed p. 22)
National Recreation and Park Association
Minneola’s band through 2024
Middle half of reported values: $85–$369.
NRPA says these results are not standards that agencies should strive to meet. Survey medians describe reporting agencies. A recommended spending level or Minneola funding shortfall has not been established.
NRPA 2026 APR, printed p. 22 ↗Observed benchmark · not a target
11.2 acres per 1,000
2026 Agency Performance Review, Figure 2 (printed p. 10)
National Recreation and Park Association
Quartiles 6.0–17.2
NRPA says these results are not standards that agencies should strive to meet. Survey medians describe reporting agencies. A recommended spending level or Minneola funding shortfall has not been established.
NRPA 2026 APR, printed p. 10 ↗No selected benchmark in this source group for this category. Try another source group; absence here is not a confirmed zero.
See Minneola’s five- and ten-year actual capital investment, separate from the future capital plan.
No applicable dollar spending recommendation has been verified for this category. An observed average is not a recommended minimum. Service access, response and facilities targets need their own local evidence.
Minneola · available FY2026 plan
$4,834,426
Project-year snapshot · see Parks for five-year context
City + CRA · identified service uses
This combined context includes all selected operations, capital and unsplit grant lines. It can differ from the narrower comparison category above.
FY2026 posted plan · final version unconfirmed. These are known subtotals, not a complete citywide service inventory.
| Spending fund | Identified amount |
|---|---|
| General Fund | $816,668 |
| Downtown CRA | $4,750,000 |
| Mountain Properties CRA | No service line selected · not a confirmed zero |
| Other City funds | Full service mapping not established |
Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Adopted
Parks capital + recreation impact-fee fund + capital projects fund · pp. 153, 284
Excludes arts center and historic village projects
Earlier capital-object selection; a matching asset-purpose crosswalk has not been reviewed.
Clermont budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted (fund totals only)
Selected capital projects from CIP financial summary · budget pp. 341–343; standalone CIP pp. 29–31
Includes major restoration listed in operating accounts; excludes SaaS and bundled turf/maintenance. See Parks for summary/form discrepancies.
Eustis budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed (adopted version not found)
Parks capital + CRA park improvements + capital projects fund · pp. 70–80, 85
Earlier capital-object selection; a matching asset-purpose crosswalk has not been reviewed.
Fruitland Park budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Selected FY2026 capital program: parks, trails and community centers · pp. 96–98
Includes project design and at least $11.773M carryforward; see Parks for full scope/funding
Groveland budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Parks and Recreation capital · pp. 14, 16
Impact-fee money is transferred into the General Fund, so it is already included
Lady Lake budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Capital Projects Fund: Palmetto Sports Complex/gym floor plus Recreation fleet · pp. 330, 506, 510
Leesburg budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed tables in final-hearing packet
Surtax, recreation impact-fee and ARPA funds: Recreational Complex · pp. 51, 56, 58
Not comparable: Three funds list the same Recreational Complex project and may overlap
Earlier capital-object selection; a matching asset-purpose crosswalk has not been reviewed.
Mascotte budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Selected parks/recreation capital plus agency support and forest preserve · pp. 55, 143–144, 207–208
Includes $9.919M recreation center and $1.4M carryforward; future concepts remain unverified
Mount Dora budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
FY2026 park/recreation asset-purpose crosswalk, including Public Buildings and equipment under General Government · PDF pp. 585–587, 591
Tavares budget document ↗No matching actual-spending benchmark has been selected for this category. Parks history and capital evidence remain available separately.
No selected benchmark in this source group for this category. Try another source group; absence here is not a confirmed zero.
See Minneola’s five- and ten-year actual capital investment, separate from the future capital plan.
No applicable dollar spending recommendation has been verified for this category. An observed average is not a recommended minimum. Service access, response and facilities targets need their own local evidence.
NRPA reports next-five-year agency capital budgets, not a recommended amount.
Minneola · available FY2026 plan
$870,175
Includes $577K grant spending
Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Adopted
County branch library
Not comparable: Served by a Lake County branch library
Clermont budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted (fund totals only)
Not obtained
Not comparable: Budget book recovered; department figures not yet selected for this comparison
Eustis budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed (adopted version not found)
Library · p. 64
Fruitland Park budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
County-operated branch library
Not comparable: Lake County runs the local branch library
Groveland budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Library and Information Services · p. 14
Includes $1.56M capital
Lady Lake budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed tables in final-hearing packet
County branch library
Not comparable: Served by a Lake County branch library
Mascotte budget document ↗Observed benchmark · not a target
$33
Table 24, FY2023–24
Florida Division of Library and Information Services
Lake County Library System: $25
An observed statewide average, not a recommendation. Minneola’s library belongs to the county library cooperative, so county spending also supports it.
DLIS Table 24, statewide row ↗No selected benchmark in this source group for this category. Try another source group; absence here is not a confirmed zero.
No applicable dollar spending recommendation has been verified for this category. An observed average is not a recommended minimum. Service access, response and facilities targets need their own local evidence.
Professional guidance · applicability not established
Florida Public Library Outcomes & Standards (2015) · At least 10,000 items (3 per resident preferred) and 10–15% of the budget on materials, for populations up to 25,000
The cited edition is retained as research context. Its current status, local applicability and Minneola’s matching service measure must be checked before assessing performance; this is not a verified local requirement or compliance finding.
Read the cited guidance: FLA standards PDF pp. 9, 12 ↗Minneola · available FY2026 plan
$1,521,260
Excludes the one-time $9M grant project
City + CRA · identified service uses
This combined context includes all selected operations, capital and unsplit grant lines. It can differ from the narrower comparison category above.
FY2026 posted plan · final version unconfirmed. These are known subtotals, not a complete citywide service inventory.
| Spending fund | Identified amount |
|---|---|
| General Fund | $10,521,260 |
| Downtown CRA | $2,500,000 |
| Mountain Properties CRA | $1,250,000 |
| Other City funds | Full service mapping not established |
Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Adopted
Streets Maintenance · p. 117
Clermont budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted (fund totals only)
Not obtained
Not comparable: Budget book recovered; department figures not yet selected for this comparison
Eustis budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed (adopted version not found)
Roads & Streets · p. 59
Fruitland Park budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Streets Maintenance · p. 14
Includes $1.34M capital
Lady Lake budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed tables in final-hearing packet
Street Lighting · p. 36
Not comparable: Street lighting only; street repairs sit inside Public Works
Mascotte budget document ↗Observed benchmark · not a target
$163
Municipal expenditures, FY2024 (our median of 65 cities)
Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research (state financial reports)
FY2024 actual spending, all funds, account 541 Road and Street Facilities
Middle half of reported values: $97–$219.
This is our median of all 65 Florida cities with an FY2024 state workbook in the 10,000–24,999 population band, not a statewide average or a service-matched peer group. Non-provider, zero and missing-report screening remains outstanding; no arithmetic gap is shown.
EDR per-city expenditure workbooks, sheet 2024 (every city workbook with FY2024 population 10,000–24,999: 65 cities, Minneola included); medians and nearest-rank quartiles computed by us, checked October 20, 2026 ↗No selected benchmark in this source group for this category. Try another source group; absence here is not a confirmed zero.
No applicable dollar spending recommendation has been verified for this category. An observed average is not a recommended minimum. Service access, response and facilities targets need their own local evidence.
No applicable per-resident road spending recommendation is verified here. Pavement condition and adopted local service targets need separate evidence; City costs alone do not describe County or State roads.
Minneola · available FY2026 plan
$5,271,260
General Fund (no grant) + CRA road projects
City + CRA · identified service uses
This combined context includes all selected operations, capital and unsplit grant lines. It can differ from the narrower comparison category above.
FY2026 posted plan · final version unconfirmed. These are known subtotals, not a complete citywide service inventory.
| Spending fund | Identified amount |
|---|---|
| General Fund | $10,521,260 |
| Downtown CRA | $2,500,000 |
| Mountain Properties CRA | $1,250,000 |
| Other City funds | Full service mapping not established |
Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Adopted
Streets Maintenance + infrastructure and capital projects funds · pp. 117, 283
Streets capital is $3.05M on p. 283 but $2.725M on p. 288
Clermont budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted (fund totals only)
Street Improvement fund total only · Exhibit A p. 87
Not comparable: Recovered budget detail has not yet been selected for this all-funds roads comparison
Eustis budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed (adopted version not found)
Roads & Streets + CRA streets and sidewalks + road resurfacing fund · pp. 59, 80, 85
Excludes a $600K unclassified CRA line
Fruitland Park budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Streets + CRA streetscape and downtown infrastructure + surtax · pp. 81, 102–104, 121
Excludes a $765K CDBG grant
Groveland budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Streets Maintenance · p. 14
No separate road funds; sales-tax road capital is inside this total
Lady Lake budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Street Maintenance + gas-tax road projects in the Capital Projects Fund · pp. 190, 330
Excludes a $1.5M downtown parking project
Leesburg budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed tables in final-hearing packet
Street work sits inside Public Works
Not comparable: General Fund street repairs are not separately budgeted
Mascotte budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Road & Street Facilities + sales-tax fund + General Construction road projects · pp. 26, 99, 143–144
Includes $3.06M Donnelly Street reconstruction carried forward; excludes a $1.3M parking project
Mount Dora budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Street Maintenance + sales-tax paving and SR 19 plan · pp. 213, 351–352
Paving is $287,958 on p. 352 but $400,000 on p. 579
Tavares budget document ↗Observed benchmark · not a target
$163
Municipal expenditures, FY2024 (our median of 65 cities)
Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research (state financial reports)
FY2024 actual spending, all funds, account 541 Road and Street Facilities
Middle half of reported values: $97–$219.
This is our median of all 65 Florida cities with an FY2024 state workbook in the 10,000–24,999 population band, not a statewide average or a service-matched peer group. Non-provider, zero and missing-report screening remains outstanding; no arithmetic gap is shown.
EDR per-city expenditure workbooks, sheet 2024 (every city workbook with FY2024 population 10,000–24,999: 65 cities, Minneola included); medians and nearest-rank quartiles computed by us, checked October 20, 2026 ↗No selected benchmark in this source group for this category. Try another source group; absence here is not a confirmed zero.
No applicable dollar spending recommendation has been verified for this category. An observed average is not a recommended minimum. Service access, response and facilities targets need their own local evidence.
No applicable per-resident road spending recommendation is verified here. Pavement condition and adopted local service targets need separate evidence; City costs alone do not describe County or State roads.
Minneola · available FY2026 plan
$1,289,809
Planning + Code Enforcement
Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Adopted
Planning & Development (includes code enforcement) · p. 82
Clermont budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted (fund totals only)
Not obtained
Not comparable: Budget book recovered; department figures not yet selected for this comparison
Eustis budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed (adopted version not found)
Building & Zoning (combined) · p. 51
Not comparable: Planning is combined with building permits ($1,642,944)
Fruitland Park budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Planning & Zoning + Code Compliance · pp. 43, 73
Groveland budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Growth Management + Code Enforcement · p. 14
Includes $564K capital
Lady Lake budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Community Development · p. 107
Not comparable: Net of a $410,614 charge to utilities; code enforcement sits in Police
Leesburg budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed tables in final-hearing packet
Planning + Code Compliance · pp. 16, 27
Mascotte budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Planning & Development + Code Compliance · p. 26
Mount Dora budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Community Development + Code Enforcement · pp. 81, 184
Community Development also covers economic development
Tavares budget document ↗No matching actual-spending benchmark has been selected for this category. Parks history and capital evidence remain available separately.
No selected benchmark in this source group for this category. Try another source group; absence here is not a confirmed zero.
No applicable dollar spending recommendation has been verified for this category. An observed average is not a recommended minimum. Service access, response and facilities targets need their own local evidence.
Minneola · available FY2026 plan
$2,555,043
Council, manager, clerk, finance, legal, HR, IT
Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Adopted
Council, clerk, manager, finance, legal, IT, HR, procurement · pp. 65–149
Clermont budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted (fund totals only)
Not obtained
Not comparable: Budget book recovered; department figures not yet selected for this comparison
Eustis budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed (adopted version not found)
Legislative, executive, finance, legal · pp. 28–36
Fruitland Park budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Council, administration, clerk, finance, procurement, HR, communications, legal, IT · pp. 20–55
Groveland budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Commission, manager, clerk, elections, finance, HR, IT, communications, legal · p. 14
Lady Lake budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Commission, finance, HR, IT, GIS · p. 107
Not comparable: Net of charges to utilities and excludes the $3.4M Executive department
Leesburg budget document ↗Geographic context · outside the 0.5–2× population band
FY2026 · Proposed tables in final-hearing packet
Council, administration, finance, legal · p. 16
Excludes the $621,200 CRA transfer inside Finance (our adjustment, matching Minneola)
Mascotte budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Council, manager, clerk, communications, attorney, finance, customer service, HR, IT · p. 26
Mount Dora budget document ↗FY2026 · Adopted
Council, administration, finance, IT, legal, clerk, HR, communications · p. 81
Includes about $1.75M of transfers and other items
Tavares budget document ↗Observed benchmark · not a target
$575
Municipal expenditures, FY2024 (our median of 65 cities)
Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research (state financial reports)
FY2024 actual spending, all funds, account 51x General Government
Middle half of reported values: $432–$783.
This is our median of all 65 Florida cities with an FY2024 state workbook in the 10,000–24,999 population band, not a statewide average or a service-matched peer group. Non-provider, zero and missing-report screening remains outstanding; no arithmetic gap is shown.
EDR per-city expenditure workbooks, sheet 2024 (every city workbook with FY2024 population 10,000–24,999: 65 cities, Minneola included); medians and nearest-rank quartiles computed by us, checked October 20, 2026 ↗No selected benchmark in this source group for this category. Try another source group; absence here is not a confirmed zero.
No applicable dollar spending recommendation has been verified for this category. An observed average is not a recommended minimum. Service access, response and facilities targets need their own local evidence.
The posted document retains a draft footer. Planned amounts are not actual spending or the current FY2027 budget.
Every city’s total includes different one-time items: Minneola’s $9M road grant and $6.7M of CRA payments, Groveland’s reserves, Mascotte’s $20M facility. Use the service rows below for a fairer picture.
Minneola buys police service from the Lake County Sheriff’s Office; most nearby cities run their own departments. Contract and in-house costs are not directly comparable.
Minneola’s total includes $1,180,000 of capital purchases this year. Some cities budget fire through a separate assessment fund or rely on Lake County.
Selected General Fund parks and recreation operating lines. Agency survey coverage and municipal service boundaries differ; full City/CRA service mapping remains incomplete.
These are selected capital-project plans, not typical annual rates or verified payments; project planning/restoration can sit in operating accounts. Groveland carries forward regional-park funding; Mount Dora includes a CRA-financed recreation center. The Parks section compares five-year plans with funding and coverage limits.
Minneola’s library budget includes $576,630 of grant expenditures. Not every nearby city runs its own library.
We removed Minneola’s $9,000,000 grant project to compare routine budgets. Many cities budget roads in separate transportation or sales-tax funds, so General Fund road budgets understate total road spending.
Includes CRA and other-fund road projects, excluding one-time grants and parking projects on both sides. Groveland includes an unsplit $1.71M CRA downtown infrastructure line; Fruitland Park excludes a $600K unclassified CRA line.
Minneola’s Permitting department ($1,887,334) is left out because most nearby cities run building permits from a separate, fee-funded fund. Fast growth raises planning workload.
Minneola’s Executive department is counted without its CRA payments. Cities split overhead differently, and some charge part of it to utility funds.
Individual records for context. Budget versions, service coverage and fund structures differ. No matched peer median, ranking or percentage gap is established. Amounts are listed alphabetically, not by spending.
Own police, fire (with new EMS transport program), parks & recreation incl. performing arts center, electric franchise-heavy revenue; water/sewer/solid waste/stormwater utility funds; building services separate; library is Lake County system branch; much larger (51k residents).
51,042 residents · BEBR April 1, 2025
Own police, fire (no fire assessment; funded from GF), library, recreation; Building Services in separate fund; water/sewer, stormwater utilities (no city electric); police and fire pension funds.
24,477 residents · BEBR April 1, 2025
Own police; no own fire dept (Villages Public Safety contract paid by fire assessment); library, pool, recreation city-run; building & zoning in GF funded by permit-fund transfer; solid waste and stormwater inside GF; water/sewer utility fund separate (3.75M). Part of the city lies in The Villages.
8,732 residents · BEBR April 1, 2025
Own police (+ dispatch) in GF; own fire dept in separate Fire Operations Fund subsidized by GF transfer; Building Services Fund separate; own water/sewer utility fund; sanitation (3.375M) budgeted in GF; library is county branch; 3 large construction funds (parks, fire station, public safety complex) outside GF.
23,827 residents · BEBR April 1, 2025
Town, not city. No town fire department: fire is a Villages Public Safety Dept (VCCDD) pass-through funded by a fire assessment. Own police, library, building services, water/sewer utility (separate fund), solid waste is a pass-through to Waste Management. Large Sumter/Lake split with The Villages.
16,978 residents · BEBR April 1, 2025
City-owned electric, gas, water, wastewater, solid waste utilities transfer 10.6M (10%) to GF; own police and fire (assessment revenue in GF); city library; marina and Bikefest in GF; building inspection within Fire/Life Safety; code enforcement within Police.
37,541 residents · BEBR April 1, 2025
Own police; fire via Lake County Fire Rescue (merged 2020; GF budget only 25,000); no library (county branch in Groveland); water/sewer/stormwater enterprise funds; building done by contract; sanitation and street lighting funded by non-ad valorem assessments inside GF.
9,894 residents · BEBR April 1, 2025
Owns electric utility (Fund 410), water/sewer, sanitation, stormwater; own police and fire (fire assessment fee fund separate); library city-run with county library funding; Building Dept in separate fund; two CRAs; GF receives large utility 'direct allocations' (~3.6M) and PILOT/ROI.
18,896 residents · BEBR April 1, 2025
Own police and fire (fire assessment fund transfers into GF), city library, water/wastewater, solid waste, stormwater, seaplane base, pavilion funds; building permits in separate fund; no electric utility.
21,869 residents · BEBR April 1, 2025
This view uses the period printed on each source, which may differ from the FY2026 plan. Florida size groups have not been screened for equivalent service provision; national agencies may serve different populations. These are contextual observations, not a ranked comparison.
Only final service-use lines are included here. General Fund payments into the CRA’s two area funds are not added again. Unassigned CRA uses, other funds and any remaining internal reimbursements need reconciliation before these can be called complete service totals. Utility and stormwater spending is shown separately in Utilities & debt.
These are identified unresolved lines, not an exhaustive residual. The underlying Turnpike agreement is not established here; its payment is not assumed to be an internal City transfer.
CRA financing includes contributions from outside City government; these figures describe spending by the funds, not solely City tax funding or equal benefits throughout the City. See each CRA’s full budget and funding sources.
Operating rate each city set for FY2026, in mills ($1 per $1,000 of taxable value). The tick marks each city’s “rolled-back” rate: the rate that would raise the same property-tax revenue from existing property as the year before.
The default service comparison covers selected governmental spending and CRA uses. Utility and stormwater budgets are separate in Utilities & debt. Fund totals and reconciliation retain the wider budget and known source differences.